Michael Lipkin
Jan 12, 2022

To get VC money one must be an arrogant bullshitter so it is interesting to compare the 'careers' of Elizabeth Holmes vs Adam Neumann since the latter ended up with a personal fortune > $1 billion and the former in jail.

As you say Holmes made the mistake of devising a formally checkable business idea whereas Neumann's ideas were always vague bullshit.

Saying she also had a working device was, well, fraud.

The lesson for those who want to follow in Neumann's footsteps is to make up a vague unverifiable set of bullshit, then the Ponzi scheme can be kept going as long as possible, enabling you to siphon of some cash into your pocket.

Since VCs are basically looking to get in early on a Ponzi scheme the facts don't matter to them.

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Responses (1)

Write a response

The real distinction I'm trying to draw is the fact Neumann's "vague bullshit" ideas as you called them were prospective, whereas Holmes' were representing present day reality. Yes, hers were scientific and readily verifiable, making the fraud case…